<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tabloid hypocrisy, #374</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sfocata.co.uk/2010/03/venables-tabloid-hypocrisy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sfocata.co.uk/2010/03/venables-tabloid-hypocrisy</link>
	<description>Adrian Clark&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.sfocata.co.uk/2010/03/venables-tabloid-hypocrisy/comment-page-1#comment-14223</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sfocata.co.uk/?p=719#comment-14223</guid>
		<description>I agree completely.  Here is another interesting article:

http://the-bastard.com/index.php?section=1&amp;page=2221

It reminds me of the time when the News of the World printed pictures of known paedophiles on it&#039;s front cover.  That lasted a couple of weeks before they had to stop because mobs attacked ‘lookalikes’!  They also attacked a paediatrician!!  People can&#039;t be trusted with that kind of information.  That is why I am strongly against Sarah&#039;s law.  People have a right to know if a paedophile is living in their area, but not who they are and where they live.  It should be the responsibility of the police and local authorities to keep them in check.  If they can’t do that – I wouldn’t be against holding paedophiles in institutions for life. 

Sarah Payne&#039;s mother and Denise Fergus should not be held as public authorities in cases like these.  I feel a strong sympathy for them both - like everyone does.  But they have both proven themselves to be reactionary and irrational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely.  Here is another interesting article:</p>
<p><a href="http://the-bastard.com/index.php?section=1&#038;page=2221" rel="nofollow">http://the-bastard.com/index.php?section=1&#038;page=2221</a></p>
<p>It reminds me of the time when the News of the World printed pictures of known paedophiles on it&#8217;s front cover.  That lasted a couple of weeks before they had to stop because mobs attacked ‘lookalikes’!  They also attacked a paediatrician!!  People can&#8217;t be trusted with that kind of information.  That is why I am strongly against Sarah&#8217;s law.  People have a right to know if a paedophile is living in their area, but not who they are and where they live.  It should be the responsibility of the police and local authorities to keep them in check.  If they can’t do that – I wouldn’t be against holding paedophiles in institutions for life. </p>
<p>Sarah Payne&#8217;s mother and Denise Fergus should not be held as public authorities in cases like these.  I feel a strong sympathy for them both &#8211; like everyone does.  But they have both proven themselves to be reactionary and irrational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
